F. F. Slocomb & Co. v. A. C. Layman Mach. Co.
230 F. 1021, 144 C.C.A. 286, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1523
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 9, 1916·No. No. 2001·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
In this patent case we have had the benefit of an able and illuminating opinion by the judge below, which is reported in 227 Fed. 94. The case was thoroughly argued in this court, and has since had our careful examination and consideration. We find no error in the decree below, and it will be affirmed. An opinion by us would simply be an effort to restate in different language what has already been so well said by Judge Bradford. We avoid needless duplication by adopting his opinion as expressive of our views.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
F. F. Slocomb & Co. v. A. C. Layman Mach. Co., 230 F. 1021, 144 C.C.A. 286, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1523 (3d Cir. 1916).
230 F. 1021 (F. F. Slocomb & Co. v. A. C. Layman Mach. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. P. & D. Mfg. Co.
8 F. Supp. 314 (E.D. New York, 1934)
Connecticut Telephone & Electric Co. v. Automotive Equipment Co.
14 F.2d 957 (D. New Jersey, 1926)
Greenawalt v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
3 F.2d 658 (D. Montana, 1925)
Pacific States Electric Co. v. Wright
277 F. 756 (Ninth Circuit, 1922)