F. F. Shore & Co. v. Romaner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

F. F. Shore & Co. v. Romaner

1 A.D.2d 690, 146 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3834

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 1955·Published

Opinion

In an action for rescission of the sale of a business and for other relief, the appeal is from an order enjoining pendente lite, on conditions, the disposal of promissory notes constituting part of the purchase price and collateral. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The injunction comes within the scope of section 878 of the Civil Practice Act if the disposition of the notes would tend to render the judgment ineffectual. (Ocorr v. Lynn, 105 Misc. 489; cf. Babho Realty Co. v. Feffer, 230 App. Div. 866.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur; Beldock, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for rescission of the sale of a business and for other relief, the appeal is from an order enjoining pendente lite, on conditions, the disposal of promissory notes constituting part of the purchase price and collateral. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The injunction comes within the scope of section 878 of the Civil Practice Act if the disposition of the notes would tend to render the judgment ineffectual. (Ocorr v. Lynn, 105 Misc. 489; cf. Babho Realty Co. v. Feffer, 230 App. Div. 866.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur; Beldock, J., not voting.

F. F. Shore & Co. v. Romaner, 1 A.D.2d 690, 146 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

1 A.D.2d 690 (F. F. Shore & Co. v. Romaner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related