F. D. Rich Company, Inc. And American Surety Company of New York v. United States of America for the Use of H. G. Harders & Son, Inc.
308 F.2d 807
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 17, 1962·No. 19502·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Before us, as before the district court, the sufficiency of notice under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq., is the primary question. This case is controlled by the principles stated in Coffee v. United States, 5th Cir. 1946, 157 F.2d 968. For the reasons there stated, the judgment of the district court, 199 F.Supp. 939, is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
F. D. Rich Company, Inc. And American Surety Company of New York v. United States of America for the Use of H. G. Harders & Son, Inc., 308 F.2d 807 (5th Cir. 1962).
308 F.2d 807 (F. D. Rich Company, Inc. And American Surety Company of New York v. United States of America for the Use of H. G. Harders & Son, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States of America for and on Behalf of Mississippi Road Supply Co. v. H. R. Morgan, Inc. And U. S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co.
542 F.2d 262 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)