F-C Properties, Inc. v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

F-C Properties, Inc. v. Burns

7 A.D.2d 1014, 185 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9575

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 1014 (F-C Properties, Inc. v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F-C Properties, Inc. v. Burns, 7 A.D.2d 1014, 185 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order dismissing the petition in a proceeding pursuant [1015]*1015to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay, which determination denied an application for a special permit to erect a public garage and gasoline filling station in an “ F ” business district under the town zoning ordinance. Subsequent to the denial of the application for a permit the ordinance was amended so that such use is not permissible in the district. The reply alleges that the amended ordinance is confiscatory and void. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order dismissing the petition in a proceeding pursuant [1015]*1015to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay, which determination denied an application for a special permit to erect a public garage and gasoline filling station in an “ F ” business district under the town zoning ordinance. Subsequent to the denial of the application for a permit the ordinance was amended so that such use is not permissible in the district. The reply alleges that the amended ordinance is confiscatory and void. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 1014, 185 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-c-properties-inc-v-burns-nyappdiv-1959.