F. C. Gross & Bros. v. Industrial Commission

167 N.W. 809, 167 Wis. 612, 1918 Wisc. LEXIS 119
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 8, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 167 N.W. 809 (F. C. Gross & Bros. v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
F. C. Gross & Bros. v. Industrial Commission, 167 N.W. 809, 167 Wis. 612, 1918 Wisc. LEXIS 119 (Wis. 1918).

Opinion

The following opinion was filed May 21, 1918:

Eschweiler, J.

The appellants contend that the employment of the deceased was casual and also not in the usual course of the trade, business, profession, or occupation of the employer. These questions involve consideration of the same provisions of the statute, sub. (2), sec. 2394 — 7, involved in Holmen C. Asso. v. Industrial Comm., ante, p. 470, 167 N. W. 808, and the construction there placed upon the provisions of this statute must control in this case and necessitates affirmance of the rulings of the circuit court and of the Industrial Commission and a confirming of the award.

His injury occurred, not under the contract of employment by which he was working at loading the ear with fertilizer on the Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday preceding the accident, but under the contract of employment made at the completion of that work on Wednesday, by which new contract he was. to assist in doing the cleaning up necessitated by the special repair work which had just been finished.

Although it may not have been strictly accurate to speak of the work the-deceased was doing at the time of his injury, as was said in the court below, that it was in the nature of janitor service or as a part of the continual cleaning-up process going on in that industry all the time, still it was repair work.

Repairs about an industrial plant, whether such repairs are what might be called usual and to be anticipated, or are [615]*615of such, a nature that they may occur but once in a long industrial life, are none the less repairs, and work on such repairs, either general or special, is neither casual nor without the usual course of the business of the employer as we now construe those terms in this statute.

By the Oourt. — The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

OwbN, J., took no part.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, without costs, on July 8, 1918.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garrison v. Gortler
13 N.W.2d 358 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1944)
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Pixler
192 So. 617 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
McFall v. Barton-Mansfield Co.
61 S.W.2d 911 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1933)
Nelson v. Stukey
300 P. 287 (Montana Supreme Court, 1931)
Johnson v. Wisconsin Lumber & Supply Co.
234 N.W. 506 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1931)
Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.
153 S.E. 591 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Wells v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n
6 S.W.2d 346 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1928)
Ploetz v. Industrial Commission
217 N.W. 325 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1928)
Fox v. Fafnir Bearing Co.
139 A. 778 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1928)
Oilmen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Gilleland
291 S.W. 197 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1927)
Sink v. Pharaoh
212 N.W. 192 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)
Wagner v. Wooley
152 N.E. 856 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1926)
Guse v. Industrial Commission
205 N.W. 428 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1925)
Hasenfus v. Industrial Commission
199 N.W. 158 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1924)
Gotchy v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
194 N.W. 663 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1923)
Consolidated Underwriters v. Saxon
250 S.W. 447 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Callihan v. Montgomery
115 A. 889 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Frint Motor Car Co. v. Industrial Commission
170 N.W. 285 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1919)
Holmen Creamery Ass'n v. Industrial Commission
167 N.W. 808 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1918)
Jordan v. Weinman
167 N.W. 810 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 N.W. 809, 167 Wis. 612, 1918 Wisc. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-c-gross-bros-v-industrial-commission-wis-1918.