F. B. Williams Cypress Co. v. Police Jury St. Martin Parish

Supreme Court of Louisiana

F. B. Williams Cypress Co. v. Police Jury St. Martin Parish

55 So. 878, 129 La. 267, 1911 La. LEXIS 747

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 26, 1911

DocketNo. 18,456

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 55 So. 878 (F. B. Williams Cypress Co. v. Police Jury St. Martin Parish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F. B. Williams Cypress Co. v. Police Jury St. Martin Parish, 55 So. 878, 129 La. 267, 1911 La. LEXIS 747 (La. 1911).

Pincite

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

MONROE, J.-

Plaintiffs are three lumber companies, owning property in the second ward of the parish of St. Martin, but domiciled in neighboring parishes, and they are here as appellees from a judgment enjoining the levying and collecting of a special tax, said to have been voted by a few (13) of the other property taxpayers of the ward, for the dredging of a navigation canal through parts of the first and third wards of the parish.

They move to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that appellants allowed the greater part of the 60 days, granted for its return to this court, to elapse before instructing the clerk to prepare the transcript, and then obtained an order granting an extension of the delay, upon the allegation that there was not sufficient time for him to do so, which, say the counsel for the appellees, was true, but was the fault of the appellants, who should not have been allowed the extension, and whose appeal should now be dismissed. The police jury is the main appellant, and, as its mind consists of parts, which it may have had some difficulty in collecting, from different sections of the parish, we think some allowance should be made for it, particularly as the appellees have not been prejudiced in any way, and as we propose to affirm the judgment appealed from. The motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

MONROE, J.-

Plaintiffs are three lumber companies, owning property in the second ward of the parish of St. Martin, but domiciled in neighboring parishes, and they are here as appellees from a judgment enjoining the levying and collecting of a special tax, said to have been voted by a few (13) of the other property taxpayers of the ward, for the dredging of a navigation canal through parts of the first and third wards of the parish.

They move to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that appellants allowed the greater part of the 60 days, granted for its return to this court, to elapse before instructing the clerk to prepare the transcript, and then obtained an order granting an extension of the delay, upon the allegation that there was not sufficient time for him to do so, which, say the counsel for the appellees, was true, but was the fault of the appellants, who should not have been allowed the extension, and whose appeal should now be dismissed. The police jury is the main appellant, and, as its mind consists of parts, which it may have had some difficulty in collecting, from different sections of the parish, we think some allowance should be made for it, particularly as the appellees have not been prejudiced in any way, and as we propose to affirm the judgment appealed from. The motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 So. 878, 129 La. 267, 1911 La. LEXIS 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-b-williams-cypress-co-v-police-jury-st-martin-parish-la-1911.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack