F. B. Wilcon Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

F. B. Wilcon Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 512, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1670

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 20, 1966

DocketC.D. 2858

StatusPublished

This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 512 (F. B. Wilcon Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F. B. Wilcon Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 512, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1670 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, Chief Judge:

When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance by or on behalf of plaintiff, although due notice as to the time and place of trial had been given.

[513]*513It appearing from the official papers that the entry herein was liquidated on December 24, 1964, but that the protest was not filed until December 29,1965, a date exceeding the statutory limit of 60 days fixed for filing protest in section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the protest is untimely, and is, therefore, dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, Chief Judge:

When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance by or on behalf of plaintiff, although due notice as to the time and place of trial had been given.

[513]*513It appearing from the official papers that the entry herein was liquidated on December 24, 1964, but that the protest was not filed until December 29,1965, a date exceeding the statutory limit of 60 days fixed for filing protest in section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the protest is untimely, and is, therefore, dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Cust. Ct. 512, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-b-wilcon-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.