F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States
This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1066 (F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of melting furnaces imported as entireties with electric motors of more than 1/10 horsepower similar in all material respects to those the subject of F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 325, C. D. 2644), wherein it was held that the ovens and motors were separate articles of commerce, the protests were dismissed and the matter remanded for further proceedings to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the separate value of the ovens and motors in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Cust. Ct. 1066, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-b-vandegrift-co-v-united-states-cusc-1969.