F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 394, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1771
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 4, 1949
DocketNo. 7658; Entry No. 2071
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Cust. Ct. 394 (F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 394, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1771 (cusc 1949).

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

""Tt IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in Reappraisement Appeal 167106-A-3435 are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States, R. D. 7624, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised value of the merchandise in this case, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the [395]*395time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this ease may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values'are the appraised values, less the. additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Cust. Ct. 394, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-b-vandegrift-co-v-united-states-cusc-1949.