F. A. MacCluer, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

F. A. MacCluer, Inc. v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 370, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1538

United States Customs Court·Decided September 11, 1952·No. No. 56858; protest 140522-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the evidence presented it was held that the goods not found in the cases at the time of examination at the importer’s place of business were not landed. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entry, refunding duties taken upon the missing articles as follows: Braces, style No. 3116, 7^2 dozen; style No. 3229, 5)42 dozen; and style No. 3230, 9% dozen; and belts, style No. 0494, 27^2 dozen. (United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351, followed.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the evidence presented it was held that the goods not found in the cases at the time of examination at the importer’s place of business were not landed. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entry, refunding duties taken upon the missing articles as follows: Braces, style No. 3116, 7^2 dozen; style No. 3229, 5)42 dozen; and style No. 3230, 9% dozen; and belts, style No. 0494, 27^2 dozen. (United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351, followed.)

F. A. MacCluer, Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 370, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1538 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

29 Cust. Ct. 370 (F. A. MacCluer, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.