F. A. MacCluer, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

F. A. MacCluer, Inc. v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 370, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1538

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 11, 1952

DocketNo. 56858; protest 140522-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Cust. Ct. 370 (F. A. MacCluer, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F. A. MacCluer, Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 370, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1538 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the evidence presented it was held that the goods not found in the cases at the time of examination at the importer’s place of business were not landed. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entry, refunding duties taken upon the missing articles as follows: Braces, style No. 3116, 7^2 dozen; style No. 3229, 5)42 dozen; and style No. 3230, 9% dozen; and belts, style No. 0494, 27^2 dozen. (United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351, followed.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the evidence presented it was held that the goods not found in the cases at the time of examination at the importer’s place of business were not landed. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entry, refunding duties taken upon the missing articles as follows: Braces, style No. 3116, 7^2 dozen; style No. 3229, 5)42 dozen; and style No. 3230, 9% dozen; and belts, style No. 0494, 27^2 dozen. (United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351, followed.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Cust. Ct. 370, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-a-maccluer-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1952.