F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol

117 A. 146, 93 N.J. Eq. 657, 8 Stock. 657, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 345
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 28, 1922·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated' in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — -Trie Chibe-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bersbn, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenrieimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk — 15. For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol, 117 A. 146, 93 N.J. Eq. 657, 8 Stock. 657, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 345 (N.J. 1922).

117 A. 146 (F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.