F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol

117 A. 146, 93 N.J. Eq. 657, 8 Stock. 657, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 345
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 28, 1922
StatusPublished

This text of 117 A. 146 (F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol, 117 A. 146, 93 N.J. Eq. 657, 8 Stock. 657, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 345 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated' in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — -Trie Chibe-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bersbn, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenrieimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk — 15. For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 A. 146, 93 N.J. Eq. 657, 8 Stock. 657, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-a-cigol-rubber-co-v-cigol-nj-1922.