Ezzard Ellis v. C. Harrison

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ezzard Ellis v. C. Harrison. Read the opinion of the Court — 891 F.3d 1160
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 30, 2019·No. 16-56188·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 30 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EZZARD CHARLES ELLIS, No. 16-56188

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.

5:05-cv-00520-SJO-JEM

v. Central District of California, Riverside

C. M. HARRISON, Warden, ORDER

Respondent-Appellee.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ezzard Ellis v. C. Harrison, (9th Cir. 2019).

Ezzard Ellis v. C. Harrison (Ezzard Ellis v. C. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.