Ezra Carter v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 9, 2019
• Docket: 01-18-00838-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ezra Carter v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00838-CR

Trial court case number: 1576111

Trial court: 230th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above-referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a form motion requesting access to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant further requests a 30-day extension of time to file his pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief Appellant’s request for a copy of the record is dismissed as moot because appellant’s appointed counsel averred in both her motion to withdraw and her Anders brief that she mailed a copy of the appellate record to appellant. Appellant’s request for an extension of time to file his pro se response is granted. Appellant’s response shall be due within 30 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Justice Gordon Goodman_____ Acting individually

Date: ___May 9, 2019__