Ezey Co. v. Sherman
439 N.E.2d 883, 57 N.Y.2d 655, 454 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3601
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division in Matter of Meyers Bros. Parking Systems v Sherman (87 AD2d 562).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ezey Co. v. Sherman, 439 N.E.2d 883, 57 N.Y.2d 655, 454 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3601 (N.Y. 1982).
439 N.E.2d 883 (Ezey Co. v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Federal Insurance v. Cablevision Systems Development Co.
637 F. Supp. 1568 (E.D. New York, 1986)