Ezell v. State
313 S.W.3d 744, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2010 WL 2649830
This text of 313 S.W.3d 744 (Ezell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ezell v. State, 313 S.W.3d 744, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2010 WL 2649830 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Charles W. Ezell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Ezell asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for causing the introduction of damaging credibility evidence.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Ezell
233 S.W.3d 251 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
313 S.W.3d 744, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2010 WL 2649830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ezell-v-state-moctapp-2010.