Ezell v. State
313 S.W.3d 744, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2010 WL 2649830
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Charles W. Ezell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Ezell asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for causing the introduction of damaging credibility evidence.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ezell v. State, 313 S.W.3d 744, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2010 WL 2649830 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
313 S.W.3d 744 (Ezell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ezell
233 S.W.3d 251 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)