Ezell v. Dan River, Inc

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 17, 2003
• Docket: 02-2314
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2314

CHARLES W. EZELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAN RIVER, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-17-4)

Submitted: March 24, 2003 Decided: April 17, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles W. Ezell, Appellant Pro Se. James Phillip Naughton, Sara Lynne Berg, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Ezell appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of Dan River, Inc. (“Dan River”), his

former employer, in this action alleging retaliation in violation

of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Ezell v. Dan River, Inc.,

No. CA-02-17-4 (W.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2002). We deny Dan River’s motions

to exclude an affidavit attached to Ezell’s informal brief and to

exclude Ezell’s reply brief and deny, as moot, Ezell’s motion

seeking an extension of time to file a response to the motion to

exclude the affidavit. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED