Ezell Gilbert v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ezell Gilbert v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 640 F.3d 1293
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 1, 2010·No. 09-12513·Published

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-12513 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 1, 2010 _____________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 99-02054-CT-30-TGW

EZELL GILBERT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

____________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ____________

(July 1, 2010)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, MARTIN, and HILL, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

Presently before the court are:

1. Motion by Defendant/Appellant Gilbert for Release Pending

Appeal/Remand;

2. United States’ Response to Gilbert’s Motion for Release Pending

3. United States’ Unopposed Motion for Immediate Stay of the Mandate

Pending Final Disposition of Possible Petition for Rehearing En Banc; and,

4. Appellant Gilbert’s Response to the Government’s Motion to Stay the

Mandate.

We deal with these motions and responses as follows:

1. Defendant/Appellant Gilbert’s Motion for Release Pending

Appeal/Remand is GRANTED. The motion and this order are remanded to the

district court for the district court, expeditiously, to impose conditions, if any,

upon Gilbert’s release.

2. Inasmuch as a judge of this Court has caused the mandate to be held,

the Government’s motion for immediate stay of the mandate is DENIED, AS

MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ezell Gilbert v. United States, (11th Cir. 2010).

Ezell Gilbert v. United States (Ezell Gilbert v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.