Ezekiel Keith v. Nikki Keith
This text of Ezekiel Keith v. Nikki Keith (Ezekiel Keith v. Nikki Keith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00017-CV
Ezekiel KEITH, Appellant
v.
Nikki KEITH, Appellee
From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-CI-20274 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 18, 2026
DISMISSED
On January 6, 2026, appellant filed a notice of appeal stating his intent to appeal a judgment
rendered on December 22, 2025. Although the clerk’s record indicates a final hearing was held on
December 22, 2025, it does not contain a written judgment.
“To be appealable, a judgment or order must be written and signed by the trial court.” In
re M.R.G., No. 04-17-00623-CV, 2017 WL 4938422, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 1,
2017, no pet.); see TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1 (providing the appellate timetable runs from the date the 04-26-00017-CV
judgment or order is signed). “An oral ruling, not reduced to writing and signed by the trial court,
is not a final or otherwise appealable judgment or order.” See In re M.R.G., 2017 WL 4938422, at
*1. This court is not required to hold an appeal open until there is an appealable judgment at some
future date. Id. When there is no appealable judgment or order, we are authorized to dismiss the
appeal. Id.
Because it appeared that no written judgment had been signed in the underlying case, we
issued an order directing appellant to show cause in writing, on or before February 6, 2026, why
this appeal should not be dismissed. We warned that if appellant did not satisfactorily respond by
the deadline, this appeal would be dismissed. Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, this appeal
is dismissed. See In re M.R.G., 2017 WL 4938422, at *1; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ezekiel Keith v. Nikki Keith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ezekiel-keith-v-nikki-keith-txctapp4-2026.