EZEKIEL GANDY, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of EZEKIEL GANDY, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA (EZEKIEL GANDY, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
EZEKIEL GANDY, III, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3133 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )
Opinion filed April 4, 2018.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Ezekiel Gandy filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), claiming that his Criminal Punishment Code
scoresheet was inaccurate because its prior record section incorrectly listed offenses for
which he had not been convicted. The postconviction court denied the motion because
it would have required an evidentiary hearing. However, Gandy's claim would be
cognizable in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and it
would be timely as such. See Thomas v. State, 149 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the postconviction court to allow Gandy
the opportunity to raise the claim in a facially sufficient motion filed pursuant to Florida
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, if he has not already done so. See id.
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
SILBERMAN and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
EZEKIEL GANDY, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ezekiel-gandy-iii-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.