Ezawa v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of Am.

Ohio Supreme Court

Ezawa v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of Am.

709 N.E.2d 846, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1473, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1766

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 7, 1999

Docket98-1686

StatusPublished

This text of 709 N.E.2d 846 (Ezawa v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of Am.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ezawa v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of Am., 709 N.E.2d 846, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1473, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1766 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 97APE10-1343. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On August 14, 1998, appellants filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellants have neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B), nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellants show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IY(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 97APE10-1343. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On August 14, 1998, appellants filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellants have neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B), nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellants show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IY(6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

709 N.E.2d 846, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1473, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ezawa-v-yasuda-fire-marine-ins-co-of-am-ohio-1999.