Ez Gard Industries Inc. v. Xo Athletic Co.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedDecember 15, 2008
Docket2008-1384
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ez Gard Industries Inc. v. Xo Athletic Co. (Ez Gard Industries Inc. v. Xo Athletic Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ez Gard Industries Inc. v. Xo Athletic Co., (Fed. Cir. 2008).

Opinion

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1384

EZ GARD INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

XO ATHLETIC CO.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

PAUL J. ANDRE,

Defendant.

William L. Roberts, Faegre & Benson LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Kevin P. Wagner and Timothy E. Grimsrud.

Stephen M. Chin, von Simson & Chin LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

in CASE NO(S). 07-CV-4769

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED December 15, 2008 / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ez Gard Industries Inc. v. Xo Athletic Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ez-gard-industries-inc-v-xo-athletic-co-cafc-2008.