Ez Gard Industries Inc. v. Xo Athletic Co.
This text of Ez Gard Industries Inc. v. Xo Athletic Co. (Ez Gard Industries Inc. v. Xo Athletic Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1384
EZ GARD INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
XO ATHLETIC CO.,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
PAUL J. ANDRE,
Defendant.
William L. Roberts, Faegre & Benson LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Kevin P. Wagner and Timothy E. Grimsrud.
Stephen M. Chin, von Simson & Chin LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
in CASE NO(S). 07-CV-4769
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED December 15, 2008 / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ez Gard Industries Inc. v. Xo Athletic Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ez-gard-industries-inc-v-xo-athletic-co-cafc-2008.