Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Eyster v. Chapnick

Eyster v. Chapnick

530 So. 2d 1110, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2178, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4139, 1988 WL 96088
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 1988
DocketNo. 88-1324
StatusPublished

This text of 530 So. 2d 1110 (Eyster v. Chapnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eyster v. Chapnick, 530 So. 2d 1110, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2178, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4139, 1988 WL 96088 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Service of process upon Eyster was void because of noncompliance with section 48.-031(1), Florida Statutes (1985). We therefore reverse on authority of Willoughby v. Seese Realty, Inc., 421 So.2d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Herskowitz v. Schwarz & Schiffrin, 411 So.2d 1359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Cullimore v. Barnett Bank of Jacksonville, 386 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); see also Carlini v. State Dept. of Legal Affairs, 521 So.2d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LETTS, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cullimore v. Barnett Bank of Jacksonville
386 So. 2d 894 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Herskowitz v. Schwarz & Schiffrin
411 So. 2d 1359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Carlini v. STATE, DEPT. OF LEGAL AFFAIRS
521 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Willoughby v. Seese Realty Inc.
421 So. 2d 691 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 So. 2d 1110, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2178, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4139, 1988 WL 96088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eyster-v-chapnick-fladistctapp-1988.