Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. McDaniel ex rel. McDaniel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. McDaniel ex rel. McDaniel

172 So. 2d 905, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4425

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 19, 1965

DocketNo. 5581

StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 2d 905 (Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. McDaniel ex rel. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. McDaniel ex rel. McDaniel, 172 So. 2d 905, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4425 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Eyerly Aircraft Corporation appeals an interlocutory order at law denying its motions to dismiss on jurisdictional issues.¹ Appellant asserts, inter alia, that it is not sufficiently engaged in a business venture in the State of Florida so as to be amenable to constructive service of process.²

We find no error. The record discloses such “minimum contacts” within the State as to subject appellant to the jurisdiction of the Florida Court. Steel Joist Institute, Inc. v. J. H. Mann, III, Inc., Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 625, Second District, opinion filed 22 January 1965, Cf. Woodring v. Crown Engineering Co., Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 816, 818 citing McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 1957, 355 U.S. 220, 221, 78 S.Ct. 199, 2 L.Ed.2d 223; State ex rel. Guardian Credit Indem. Corp. v. Harrison, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 371. Other arguments presented require no discussion.

Affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Eyerly Aircraft Corporation appeals an interlocutory order at law denying its motions to dismiss on jurisdictional issues.¹ Appellant asserts, inter alia, that it is not sufficiently engaged in a business venture in the State of Florida so as to be amenable to constructive service of process.²

We find no error. The record discloses such “minimum contacts” within the State as to subject appellant to the jurisdiction of the Florida Court. Steel Joist Institute, Inc. v. J. H. Mann, III, Inc., Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 625, Second District, opinion filed 22 January 1965, Cf. Woodring v. Crown Engineering Co., Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 816, 818 citing McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 1957, 355 U.S. 220, 221, 78 S.Ct. 199, 2 L.Ed.2d 223; State ex rel. Guardian Credit Indem. Corp. v. Harrison, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 371. Other arguments presented require no discussion.

Affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 So. 2d 905, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eyerly-aircraft-co-v-mcdaniel-ex-rel-mcdaniel-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack