Eyck v. New York Marine Co.
This text of 236 A.D. 811 (Eyck v. New York Marine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence on the question of the negligence of the defendant in permitting the scow in tow to strike the abutment of the bridge, thereby causing the decedent to be thrown violently from the scow into the river, where he drowned. Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Kapper, J., dissent and vote to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eyck-v-new-york-marine-co-nyappdiv-1932.