Eyck v. Farlee

16 N.J.L. 269
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1837
StatusPublished

This text of 16 N.J.L. 269 (Eyck v. Farlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eyck v. Farlee, 16 N.J.L. 269 (N.J. 1837).

Opinion

Horrbeower, C. J.

The appeal if regular, supersedes the verdict; and the plaintiff must proceed anjJ prove his right of action.

As to the power of the Court to dismiss an appeal, at a special term, when a jury trial is demanded, it has been decided otherwise.

Ford J. concurs.

Ryersoe J.

At a special term, no jury trial can be had, notwithstanding any rule to the contrary.

Rule to shew cause, granted.

if ote. — The rule was argued at February term 1838, and then made absolute. Yide the report, post.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.J.L. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eyck-v-farlee-nj-1837.