E.Y. v. State

670 So. 2d 1079, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2826
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1996·No. No. 94-04397·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

QUINCE, Judge.

E.Y., a juvenile, challenges his adjudication and commitment for criminal mischief. Although we find no merit in his argument regarding his adjudication, we remand for resentencing.

Appellant was found guilty of criminal mischief, in violation of section 806.13, Florida Statutes (1993). The order of commitment reflected two other offenses for which appellant was adjudicated delinquent, burglary and petit theft. The court imposed one general sentence for all three offenses. A general sentence for separate offenses is prohibited. H.L.L. v. State, 595 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Additionally, the maximum sentence for criminal mischief and petit theft is sixty days.

We affirm the adjudication but remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.

BLUE, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E.Y. v. State, 670 So. 2d 1079, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 1079 (E.Y. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JPC v. State
773 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
K.D. v. State
779 So. 2d 468 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
D.L.J. v. State
765 So. 2d 740 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
B.K.W. v. State
732 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
T.B. v. State
732 So. 2d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Department of Juvenile Justice v. State
705 So. 2d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
J.M.J. v. State
742 So. 2d 261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)