Exxon Mobil Corporation F/K/A Exxon Corporation v. David Vawter and John Lazaris

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 28, 2002
Docket07-01-00037-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Exxon Mobil Corporation F/K/A Exxon Corporation v. David Vawter and John Lazaris (Exxon Mobil Corporation F/K/A Exxon Corporation v. David Vawter and John Lazaris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Exxon Mobil Corporation F/K/A Exxon Corporation v. David Vawter and John Lazaris, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION V. VAWTER
NO. 07-01-0037-CV


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL A


JANUARY 28, 2002



______________________________


EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, APPELLANT


V.


DAVID VAWTER, ET AL., APPELLEES


_________________________________


FROM THE 11TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;


NO. 1999-32545; HONORABLE MARK DAVIDSON, JUDGE


_______________________________


Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

On January 18, 2002, appellant Exxon Mobil Corporation formerly known as Exxon Corporation filed a Motion to Vacate Judgment Pursuant to Settlement according to agreement of the parties and in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The motion includes a certificate of conference representing that counsel for appellees agrees to the motion, and signature of counsel for appellees by permission.

Without passing on the merits of the case, the Motion to Vacate Judgment is granted. The judgment of the trial court signed on September 21, 2000, styled David Vawter and John Lazaris v. Exxon Corporation, Exxon Company, U.S.A., No. 1999-32545, is vacated and the case is dismissed. TRAP 42.1(a)(1); TRAP 43.2(e).

All costs are assessed to the parties incurring the same. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request and pursuant to settlement agreement, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.



Phil Johnson

Justice



Do not publish.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Exxon Mobil Corporation F/K/A Exxon Corporation v. David Vawter and John Lazaris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/exxon-mobil-corporation-fka-exxon-corporation-v-da-texapp-2002.