Exxon Corporation v. Chick Kam Choo

Fifth Circuit

Exxon Corporation v. Chick Kam Choo

849 F.2d 910, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9808, 1988 WL 67013

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Exxon Corporation v. Chick Kam Choo. Read the opinion of the Court — 817 F.2d 307 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 1, 1988·No. 86-2428·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

Obedient to the mandate of the Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1684, 100 L.Ed.2d 127 (1988), we vacate the trial court’s judgment, as well as ours affirming it, 817 F.2d 307, (5th Cir.1987), and remand the cause to that court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion above.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

Obedient to the mandate of the Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1684, 100 L.Ed.2d 127 (1988), we vacate the trial court’s judgment, as well as ours affirming it, 817 F.2d 307, (5th Cir.1987), and remand the cause to that court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion above.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Exxon Corporation v. Chick Kam Choo, 849 F.2d 910, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9808, 1988 WL 67013 (5th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

849 F.2d 910 (Exxon Corporation v. Chick Kam Choo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related