Exxon Co USA v. FERC
This text of 182 F.3d 30 (Exxon Co USA v. FERC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the district of columbia circuit
No. 95-1520 September Term, 1999
Exxon Company, U.S.A., Petitioner v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al., Respondents
Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Company, et al., Intervenors
Consolidated with 96-1078, 96-1464, 97-1733, 98-1005
On Petitions for Review of an Order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Before: Ginsburg, Sentelle and Randolph, Circuit Judges.
O R D E R
It is ORDERED by the Court, sua sponte, that the opinion in the above cases filed on July 13, 1999, be amended as follows:
Page 2, second line from bottom: Replace "carriers" with "shippers."
Page 3, eighth line from bottom: Replace "they" with "the shippers."
Page 30, fourth line: Parenthetical should read: ("It is clear . . . that in denying a refund in this case the Commission also considered the practical consequences and the purpose of the Act; hence we are required to uphold its exercise of discretionary power.")
Per curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk
Filed on October 5, 1999
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 F.3d 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/exxon-co-usa-v-ferc-cadc-1999.