Exxel/atmos, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

37 F.3d 1538, 308 U.S. App. D.C. 411, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2719, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30682
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 4, 1994·No. 93-1108·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

On Respondent’s Suggestion FOR Rehearing En Banc

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc and the Response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

Chief Judge EDWARDS and Circuit Judge SILBERMAN would grant the suggestion.

A dissenting statement filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN is attached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Exxel/atmos, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 37 F.3d 1538, 308 U.S. App. D.C. 411, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2719, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30682 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

37 F.3d 1538 (Exxel/atmos, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related