Exton v. Central Railroad
46 A. 1099, 63 N.J.L. 356, 34 Vroom 356, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 82
Opinion
The judgment in this ease is affirmed upon the opinion in the. Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Collins, Dixon, Garrison, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh. 11.
For reversal — 'None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Exton v. Central Railroad, 46 A. 1099, 63 N.J.L. 356, 34 Vroom 356, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 82 (N.J. 1899).
46 A. 1099 (Exton v. Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.
694 A.2d 1017 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1997)
Gingeleskie v. Westin Hotel Co.
961 F. Supp. 1310 (D. Arizona, 1997)
Lieberman v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW JERSEY
622 A.2d 1295 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1993)
Atamian v. Supermarkets General Corp.
369 A.2d 38 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Tormo v. Yormark
398 F. Supp. 1159 (D. New Jersey, 1975)
Smith v. West Suburban Transit Lines, Inc.
326 N.E.2d 449 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Mayer v. Housing Auth. of Jersey City
202 A.2d 439 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of Newark
186 A.2d 291 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)
Harpell v. Pub. Service Coordinated Transport
114 A.2d 295 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Crammer v. Willston Operating Co., Inc.
88 A.2d 630 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Falzarano v. D., L. W.R.R. Co.
194 A. 75 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Armstrong
1911 OK 366 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Hull v. Boston & Maine Railroad
96 N.E. 58 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Pere Marquette Railroad v. Strange
84 N.E. 819 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1908)
Holzenkamp v. Cincinnati Traction Co.
1 Hosea's Rep. 150 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1907)