Exton v. Central Railroad

46 A. 1099, 63 N.J.L. 356, 34 Vroom 356, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 82
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 19, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 46 A. 1099 (Exton v. Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Exton v. Central Railroad, 46 A. 1099, 63 N.J.L. 356, 34 Vroom 356, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 82 (N.J. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease is affirmed upon the opinion in the. Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Collins, Dixon, Garrison, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh. 11.

For reversal — 'None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.
694 A.2d 1017 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1997)
Gingeleskie v. Westin Hotel Co.
961 F. Supp. 1310 (D. Arizona, 1997)
Lieberman v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW JERSEY
622 A.2d 1295 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1993)
Atamian v. Supermarkets General Corp.
369 A.2d 38 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Tormo v. Yormark
398 F. Supp. 1159 (D. New Jersey, 1975)
Smith v. West Suburban Transit Lines, Inc.
326 N.E.2d 449 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Mayer v. Housing Auth. of Jersey City
202 A.2d 439 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of Newark
186 A.2d 291 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)
Harpell v. Pub. Service Coordinated Transport
114 A.2d 295 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Crammer v. Willston Operating Co., Inc.
88 A.2d 630 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Falzarano v. D., L. W.R.R. Co.
194 A. 75 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Armstrong
1911 OK 366 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Hull v. Boston & Maine Railroad
96 N.E. 58 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Pere Marquette Railroad v. Strange
84 N.E. 819 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1908)
Holzenkamp v. Cincinnati Traction Co.
1 Hosea's Rep. 150 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A. 1099, 63 N.J.L. 356, 34 Vroom 356, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/exton-v-central-railroad-nj-1899.