Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
580 A.2d 56, 216 Conn. 811, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 340
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 124, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Was the Appellate Court correct in including further proceedings with respect to damages in the remand when the plaintiff failed to prove damages at trial and conceded that it was entitled only to nominal damages?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp., 580 A.2d 56, 216 Conn. 811, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 340 (Colo. 1990).
580 A.2d 56 (Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
642 A.2d 62 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
590 A.2d 431 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)