Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman

137 S. Ct. 615, 196 L. Ed. 2d 491, 85 U.S.L.W. 3301, 2016 WL 7446111, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 7577

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman. Read the opinion of the Court — 581 U.S. 37 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 28, 2016·No. No. 15–1391.·Published

Opinion

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 137 S. Ct. 615, 196 L. Ed. 2d 491, 85 U.S.L.W. 3301, 2016 WL 7446111, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 7577 (U.S. 2016).

Pincite

137 S. Ct. 615 (Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.