Expressair Cargo Services, Inc. v. ZFour, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Expressair Cargo Services, Inc. v. ZFour, Inc.

738 So. 2d 1008, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10425

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 1999·No. Nos. 98-1890, 98-1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the underlying action for negligent misrepresentation, we reverse the final judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. After reviewing the record, we find that the trial court should have entered a directed verdict in favor of the defendant where the defendant’s misconduct was too tenuous to constitute a proximate cause of the plaintiffs damages. Ameriseal of N.E. Fla., Inc. v. Leiffer, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1685, 738 So.2d 993 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

As this issue is dispositive, we do not address the other issues raised by the appeal and the cross-appeal.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the underlying action for negligent misrepresentation, we reverse the final judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. After reviewing the record, we find that the trial court should have entered a directed verdict in favor of the defendant where the defendant’s misconduct was too tenuous to constitute a proximate cause of the plaintiffs damages. Ameriseal of N.E. Fla., Inc. v. Leiffer, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1685, 738 So.2d 993 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

As this issue is dispositive, we do not address the other issues raised by the appeal and the cross-appeal.

Reversed.

Expressair Cargo Services, Inc. v. ZFour, Inc., 738 So. 2d 1008, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10425 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

738 So. 2d 1008 (Expressair Cargo Services, Inc. v. ZFour, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related