Export Development Canada v. Custom Produce Sales
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CANADA, No. 1:21-cv-00684-NODJ-SKO
12 Plaintiff, v. 13 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CUSTOM PRODUCE SALES, THE CASE 14 Defendant. (Doc. 68) 15
16 17 On March 13, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 18 prejudice. (Doc. 72). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 19 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 20 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Dated: March 14, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26
27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Export Development Canada v. Custom Produce Sales (Export Development Canada v. Custom Produce Sales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.