Expo Development Corp. v. 824 South East Boulevard Realty Corp.

113 A.D.3d 549, 978 N.Y.2d 852

This text of 113 A.D.3d 549 (Expo Development Corp. v. 824 South East Boulevard Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Expo Development Corp. v. 824 South East Boulevard Realty Corp., 113 A.D.3d 549, 978 N.Y.2d 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Defendant failed to set forth a reasonable excuse for its failure to defend against this action to foreclose on a mechanic’s lien, since it offered no financial proof of its claim that it was unable to afford counsel (see Buro Happold Consulting Engrs., P.C. v RMJM, 107 AD3d 602 [1st Dept 2013]). Absent a reasonable excuse for the default, we need not determine whether defendant demonstrated a potentially meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Benson Park Assoc., LLC v Herman, 73 AD3d 464 [1st Dept 2010]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Gische and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benson Park Associates, LLC v. Herman
73 A.D.3d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D.3d 549, 978 N.Y.2d 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/expo-development-corp-v-824-south-east-boulevard-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2014.