Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. Noel Redding Estate Ltd

S.D. New York

Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. Noel Redding Estate Ltd

DecidedMay 18, 2022

Docket1:22-cv-00443

StatusUnknown

This text of Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. Noel Redding Estate Ltd (Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. Noel Redding Estate Ltd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. Noel Redding Estate Ltd, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 05/18/22 EXPERIENCE HENDRIX, LLC, AUTHENTIC HENDRIX, LLC, and SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,

Plaintiffs, No. 22-CV-0443 (RA) ORDER v. NOEL REDDING ESTATE LTD and MITCH MITCHELL ESTATE LTD, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiffs have opposed the motion, or in the alternative, sought jurisdictional discovery. At the May 4, 2022 conference Plaintiffs stated the discovery would be limited in scope, and have made a sufficient showing to justify such discovery here. Newbro v. Freed, No. 03-CV-10308 (PKC), 2004 WL 691392, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2004) (“The federal courts have discretion to order limited discovery to establish personal jurisdiction so long as plaintiff has made a threshold showing of Jurisdiction and established that his Jurisdictional position is not frivolous.”). The parties are directed to meet and confer to determine parameters for limited jurisdictional discovery that will minimize expense and delay. They shall submit a joint status letter no later than June 17, 2022. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 18, 2022 ] New York, New York / y J “Konnie Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 05/18/22 EXPERIENCE HENDRIX, LLC, AUTHENTIC HENDRIX, LLC, and SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,

Plaintiffs, No. 22-CV-0443 (RA) ORDER v. NOEL REDDING ESTATE LTD and MITCH MITCHELL ESTATE LTD, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiffs have opposed the motion, or in the alternative, sought jurisdictional discovery. At the May 4, 2022 conference Plaintiffs stated the discovery would be limited in scope, and have made a sufficient showing to justify such discovery here. Newbro v. Freed, No. 03-CV-10308 (PKC), 2004 WL 691392, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2004) (“The federal courts have discretion to order limited discovery to establish personal jurisdiction so long as plaintiff has made a threshold showing of Jurisdiction and established that his Jurisdictional position is not frivolous.”). The parties are directed to meet and confer to determine parameters for limited jurisdictional discovery that will minimize expense and delay. They shall submit a joint status letter no later than June 17, 2022. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 18, 2022 ] New York, New York / y J “Konnie Abrams United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. Noel Redding Estate Ltd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/experience-hendrix-llc-v-noel-redding-estate-ltd-nysd-2022.