Exparte Alston

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Exparte Alston

4 S.C.L. 87

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1806·Published

Opinion

^RIMKE> J.,

declared the resolution of the whole court. The attachment was not served pursuant to the attachment act, which requires a personal service on the party garnishee. In case proPerty ke ta^en> an(l no person be present to claim the same, then a copy must be fixed up at the prison door, &c. The judgment in this case appears to have gone against the party without giving him legal notice, and ought to be set aside as unjust, as well as irregular.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

^RIMKE> J.,

declared the resolution of the whole court. The attachment was not served pursuant to the attachment act, which requires a personal service on the party garnishee. In case proPerty ke ta^en> an(l no person be present to claim the same, then a copy must be fixed up at the prison door, &c. The judgment in this case appears to have gone against the party without giving him legal notice, and ought to be set aside as unjust, as well as irregular.

Motion granted.

Exparte Alston, 4 S.C.L. 87 (S.C. 1806).

Pincite

4 S.C.L. 87 (Exparte Alston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.