Expand Associates, Inc. v. Charles L. Heatherly, Acting Administrator of the Small Business Administration

913 F.2d 981, 286 U.S. App. D.C. 215, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16456, 1990 WL 134291
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedSeptember 17, 1990
Docket89-5386
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 913 F.2d 981 (Expand Associates, Inc. v. Charles L. Heatherly, Acting Administrator of the Small Business Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Expand Associates, Inc. v. Charles L. Heatherly, Acting Administrator of the Small Business Administration, 913 F.2d 981, 286 U.S. App. D.C. 215, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16456, 1990 WL 134291 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Opinion

913 F.2d 981

286 U.S.App.D.C. 215

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
EXPAND ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant,
v.
Charles L. HEATHERLY, Acting Administrator of the Small
Business Administration, et al.

No. 89-5386.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Sept. 17, 1990.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and RUTH BADER GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court order filed August 21, 1989, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
913 F.2d 981, 286 U.S. App. D.C. 215, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16456, 1990 WL 134291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/expand-associates-inc-v-charles-l-heatherly-acting-cadc-1990.