Exon Med. Equip., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Exon Med. Equip., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 2017

Docket2017 NYSlipOp 50117(U)

StatusPublished

This text of Exon Med. Equip., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Exon Med. Equip., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Exon Med. Equip., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Exon Medical Equipment, Inc., as Assignee of MADIKABA TOUNKARA, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, Third District (C. Stephen Hackeling, J.), dated March 11, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the District Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification.

For the reasons stated in Advantage Radiology P.C., as Assignee of Sofia Dana v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-2123 S C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.

Marano, P.J., Garguilo and Brands, JJ., concur.

Decision Date: January 20, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI