Exit 52 E. Truck Stop, Inc. v. Joe Legno's Riverside Serv., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Exit 52 E. Truck Stop, Inc. v. Joe Legno's Riverside Serv., Inc.

190 N.Y.S.3d 545, 217 A.D.3d 1508, 2023 NY Slip Op 03590

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 2023

Docket276 CA 22-00687

StatusPublished

This text of 190 N.Y.S.3d 545 (Exit 52 E. Truck Stop, Inc. v. Joe Legno's Riverside Serv., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Exit 52 E. Truck Stop, Inc. v. Joe Legno's Riverside Serv., Inc., 190 N.Y.S.3d 545, 217 A.D.3d 1508, 2023 NY Slip Op 03590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Exit 52 E. Truck Stop, Inc. v Joe Legno's Riverside Serv., Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 03590)

Exit 52 E. Truck Stop, Inc. v Joe Legno's Riverside Serv., Inc.

2023 NY Slip Op 03590

Decided on June 30, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, OGDEN, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.

276 CA 22-00687

[*1]EXIT 52 E. TRUCK STOP, INC., HASSELBACK EQUIPMENT, INC., AND WHITE ARROW SERVICE STATIONS, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

JOE LEGNO'S RIVERSIDE SERVICE, INC., AND ANTHONY J. LEGNO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

MICHAEL P.J. MCGORRY, BUFFALO, MAGAVERN MAGAVERN GRIMM LLP (EDWARD J. MARKARIAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

VAHEY LAW OFFICES, PLLC, ROCHESTER (JARED K. COOK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered April 7, 2022. The order granted the motion of defendants to dismiss the amended complaint and dismissed the amended complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 30, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI