Exhibits in the cause Talbot v. the Owners of the brigs Achilles, Patty & Hibernia

1 Pa. (Admiralty) 107
CourtPennsylvania Admiralty Court
DecidedJanuary 22, 1783
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Pa. (Admiralty) 107 (Exhibits in the cause Talbot v. the Owners of the brigs Achilles, Patty & Hibernia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Admiralty Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Exhibits in the cause Talbot v. the Owners of the brigs Achilles, Patty & Hibernia, 1 Pa. (Admiralty) 107 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1783).

Opinion

Deposition of Isaac Church.

Isaac Church, a witness produced, sworn and examined in this cause, on the part of the libellant, deposeth and faith, That he was on board the sloop Argo, commanded by the libellant in the above cause, in the beginning of September, anno Domini 1779, a vessel in the service of the United States — That early in the morning they saw a sail, and gave chace, and about eleven o’clock came up with and engaged her, and after a short time she surrender’d, which proved to be the brig Betsey, from St. Kitts bound to New York, a letter of marque, carrying eight guns--That deponent was ordered on board, and directed to proceed to New London — That the captain’s name was Leech, and the cargo consisted of about two hundred and fourteen puncheons of rum — That about two o’clock the same day [and not before] they saw three sail to windward, with the wind to the westward, and by their course and sail found they were in pursuit — That they ran away all night, and in the morning saw three sail to windward, which he believes were the same vessels they had seen [108]*108the day before — That they kept company still with the Argo, and about nine o’clock they came up with British colours flying, and captain Talbot seeing them coming up, and finding it impracticable to escape with his prize, gave them orders to do the best they could for themselves, and about the middle of the day the three vessels came up, and fired under British colours ; at the second fire, they hauled down their colours, which were British reversed, according to the custom of prizes, when they boarded them, and took charge of the vessel — That the three vessels above mentioned were, the brig Patty, capt. Prole, the brig Hibernia, capt. Angus, and another brig commanded by capt. Thomson, all from Philadelphia ; the first and sail bound for Spain, and the other, as he understood, for Tenerisse— That captain D--, who was a passenger on board capt. Prole, was sent, at the particular request of the deponent, on board the Betsey, to prevent the plundering which capt. Prole’s men were committing — That every man belonging to the Argo was taken out, and she was mann’d by their own men, except one of the Argo’s, who was sent back again, after a strict examination — That when deponent was sent on board the Patty, he saw a boatwain and

a sailmaker, whom he knew, and who were taken by the Argo about ten days before out of a vessel from London, and sent prisoners to Philadelphia. — That deponent, in conversation with capt. D-, told him he was fure they were British because of the boatswain and sailmaker aforesaid being there (

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Pa. (Admiralty) 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/exhibits-in-the-cause-talbot-v-the-owners-of-the-brigs-achilles-patty-paadmct-1783.