Exhibits in the cause Dean v. Angus

1 Pa. (Admiralty) 119
CourtPennsylvania Admiralty Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1783
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Pa. (Admiralty) 119 (Exhibits in the cause Dean v. Angus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Admiralty Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Exhibits in the cause Dean v. Angus, 1 Pa. (Admiralty) 119 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1783).

Opinion

THE only exhibits on the part of the libellants were, a certified copy of the sentence of the High Court of Errors and Appeals, in the case of Silas Talbot against the owners of the brigs Achilles, Patty and Hibernia ; a proof of the sums paid by the owners of the Hibernia in consequence of that decree ; and the orders signed by Angus to O’Neal, the prize master put on board the brig Betsey, after she had been taken from Silas Talbot — In these words :

“ORDERS for captn. William M’Neil to take charge of the brigantine Betsey (prize to the Patty, Achilles and Hibernia) and take her into Delaware, Chesipeak, Boston or Eggharbour or Boston. If into Delaware, to apply to Mr. John Donalson, mercht. in Philadelphia. If into Baltimore, to Mr. William Neil, mercht. If into [120]*120Boston, to Mr. William Erikin, mercht. but to get her if possible into Delaware, Eggharbour or Chesipeak, for fear of the sloop Argo’s falling in with you if you go to New England; but wherever you go, suffer no bulk to be broke until you write to and receive an answer from Mr. Donaldson. If you go to Philadelphia, stop and cast anchor at Christeen creek mouth, and to fire 3 guns. I beg of Mr. M’Neil to stand to the swd. this night, and strive hard for Pha. If you get to Pha. apply likewise to Mr. Saml. & Thos. Morris in Co. the owners of the Achilles, and Dean, Purvines and Harbourfon for the Hibernia, who is all equally concerned in the prize,
At sea, on board the brigtin.
Patty, Sept. 7th, 1779.
JOHN PROLE,
GEORGE THOMSON,
JOHN ANGUS.”

The testimony in behalf of Angus, the respondent, was as follows—

The failing orders of the owners of the Hibernia to captain Angus, in which the only passage, that had any reference to the present suit, was in these words:

-“ We advise you to keep company with the “ armed vessels bound to the eastward, as far as you think “ it prudent. And should they agree to cruise two or “ three weeks on our coast, you have our approbation in joining with them.”-

[121]*121Deposition of George Eldredge.

BEFORE me, the subscriber, judge of the court of admiralty for the state of Pennsylvania, this 25th day of April, 1785, came George Eldredge, who, being duly sworn, did declare and say — That he was a mariner on board the brig Hibernia, captain John Angus commander, at the time that captains Prole and Thomson took the brig Betsey, bound from Montserrat to New York — That when the said brig Betsey was boarded by captains Prole and Thomson, the Hibernia was astern about five or fix miles. When the Hibernia came up, captain Angus hailed the brig, and asked what she was; captain Prole answered, that she was a good prize, bound from Montserrat to New York. Captain Angus made answer, that if the brig was prize, the sloop must be one also — That captain Prole was on board the Betsey while this conversation passed. — Captain Angus asked, why one of their sail sailing brigs did not give chase to the sloop — They made answer, that they would not leave the prize till she was manned, and requested captain Angus to give chase.— That captain Angus gave orders accordingly to make sail and give chase, which was done ; and after chasing two or three leagues, the Hibernia did not come up with the chase. Captain Angus then gave orders to leave off the chase — The two brigs commanded by Prole and Thomson laying too by the prize, did not bear down on capt. Angus, so that he was obliged to turn to windward up to captains Prole and Thomson — It was then near night— Capt. Prole sent his boat for two men to put on board the prize, which capt. Angus sent. And this deponent fur[122]*122ther faith, No prisoners were received on board the Hibernia nor plunder of any kind, and that capt. Angus never had a further opportunity to speak to the brigs, they out-failed him so much. That this deponent was third mate and pilot on board the said brig Hibernia, at the time of taking the said brig Betsey.

That deponent knows nothing of capt. Angus signing orders to the prize master — That capt. Angus was not on board either of the other two brigs — That capt. Angus joined in the chase with the others before the brig Betsey was taken.

GEORGE ELDREDGE.

Sworn to, April the 25th, 1785,

before

Fran. Hopkinson.

Deposition of John Brice.

PeRSONALLY appeared John Brice, mariner, a witness produced on the part of the respondent in this cause, and being duly sworn, deposeth and faith — That he was on board the brigantine Hibernia at the time that capt. Prole and capt. Thomson took the brig Betsey from Montserrat bound to New York — At the time they boarded her the Hibernia was astern about five or fix miles— when we came up with the brig Betsey, capt. Angus hailed her and asked what she was, capt. Prole made answer, that she was a good prize from Montserrat bound to New York — Capt. Angus made answer, that if the brig was a prize the sloop must be one also, and asked capt. Prole why [123]*123one of their fast sailing brigs did not give chase to the sloop — Capt. Prole made answer that he would not leave the prize until she was manned, and requested of capt. Angus to give chase to the floop, which capt. Angus did, but, after chasing two or three leagues, found he could not come up with the sloop. Capt. Angus then gave orders to shorten fail and haul her wind to speak to the brigs, and in the evening we came up with them — the two brigs commanded by captains Prole and Thomson lying by the brig Betsey all the while. Capt. Prole sent his boat on board capt. Angus, and desired him to send two hands to go on board the brig Betsey — One of capt. Prole’s people came out of the boat and handed capt. Angus a paper, which he signed, and gave to the man again —Capt. Angus sent two men in the boat. — That capt. Angus had none of his boats out, and that he did not receive any prisoner or any plunder of any kind from the brig Betsey — That the brigs parted with her that night, and outsailed them so much, that they had it never in their power to speak to her again — And further deponent faith not.

The said deponent being cross examined, saith, That he was first mate on board the Hibernia at the time above mentioned — That he knows not the contents of the paper signed by capt. Angus — that capt. Angus sent two men on board the Betsey — that he does not know the name but of one of them, which was George — that they were both of the crew of the Hibernia — that he did not hear any directions given to them by capt. Angus — that he heard no further conversation between capt. Prole and capt. Angus, than what he has mentioned — that he was so busy aboard the Hibernia, that he does not remember whether the Betsey had any colours; that he look’d upon it to [124]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Pa. (Admiralty) 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/exhibits-in-the-cause-dean-v-angus-paadmct-1783.