Exeter Twp. v. Pa. Labor Relations Bd.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Exeter Twp. v. Pa. Labor Relations Bd.

193 A.3d 349

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 5, 2018·No. No. 92 MAL 2018; No. 96 MAL 2018·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5^th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Does Section 614 of the Municipalities Planning Code, 53 P.S. § 10614, provide sufficient basis to determine that a zoning officer is a management level employee absent evidence regarding actual job duties?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5^th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Does Section 614 of the Municipalities Planning Code, 53 P.S. § 10614, provide sufficient basis to determine that a zoning officer is a management level employee absent evidence regarding actual job duties?

Exeter Twp. v. Pa. Labor Relations Bd., 193 A.3d 349 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

193 A.3d 349 (Exeter Twp. v. Pa. Labor Relations Bd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related