Exeter Township v. PLRB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 5, 2018·No. 92 MAL 2018 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

EXETER TOWNSHIP, : No. 92 MAL 2018 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v. : : : PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS : BOARD, : : Petitioner :

EXETER TOWNSHIP : No. 96 MAL 2018 : : v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS : BOARD : : PETITION OF: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 429, : : Intervenor :

ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Does Section 614 of the Municipalities Planning Code, 53 P.S. § 10614, provide sufficient basis to determine that a zoning officer is a management level employee absent evidence regarding actual job duties?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Exeter Township v. PLRB, (Pa. 2018).

Exeter Township v. PLRB (Exeter Township v. PLRB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.