Executors of Vanderhorst v. Whitner

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Executors of Vanderhorst v. Whitner

3 S.C.L. 174

DecidedNovember 15, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C.L. 174 (Executors of Vanderhorst v. Whitner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Executors of Vanderhorst v. Whitner, 3 S.C.L. 174 (S.C. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

Sed per totam curiam,.

It is a matter in general within the dip. cretion of the district court, to order or refuse motions of this sort; and unless this discretion is abused, qr exercised contrary to the rules and principles of law, or the well settled practice of the courts, this court will not regulate or control this discretion. But independently of this reason, this court is fully satisfied that the de. cisión was legally correct, and that to have granted the motion would have been contrary to the authority of adjudged cases. 4 Bur. 1928. Cro. Jac. 229. Cro. Eliz. 69. 11 Vin. Abr. 280. 3 Salk. 105.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sed per totam curiam,.

It is a matter in general within the dip. cretion of the district court, to order or refuse motions of this sort; and unless this discretion is abused, qr exercised contrary to the rules and principles of law, or the well settled practice of the courts, this court will not regulate or control this discretion. But independently of this reason, this court is fully satisfied that the de. cisión was legally correct, and that to have granted the motion would have been contrary to the authority of adjudged cases. 4 Bur. 1928. Cro. Jac. 229. Cro. Eliz. 69. 11 Vin. Abr. 280. 3 Salk. 105.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 S.C.L. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executors-of-vanderhorst-v-whitner-sc-1802.