Executors of Tucker v. Keeler

4 Vt. 161
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 15, 1832·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Baylies, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court. — The act, (Slade’s Ed. ch. 18, s. 2.) entitled “ An act to prevent fraudulent speculations, and the sale of choses in action,” in its proviso, says, this act is not to be construed in any way to affect any lease, deed, or other conveyance to the person in possession claiming [164] adversely to the lessor, or grantor. And the rule is, that a defen- . J . , .... ■ r , dant in ejectment, who did not derive his possession from the. plaintiff^ but clairhs adversly,-. may, at any time before trial,- pur---c^ase *n an outstanding title to protect, his- possession, — (8 John. Rep. 139. I see no- e’rror in the proceedings of the county, court ;• therefore, their

Turner & Brown, for plaintiffs. sitien,- Smalley & Adams, for defendants.

Judgement is affirmed with additional- costs.-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Executors of Tucker v. Keeler, 4 Vt. 161 (Vt. 1832).

4 Vt. 161 (Executors of Tucker v. Keeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Watkins
156 S.E. 43 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Lapoint v. Sage
99 A. 233 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1916)
Wade v. Thompson
52 Miss. 367 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1876)