Executors of Sibley v. Stull

15 N.J.L. 332
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1836·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court, was delivered by

Hornblower, C. J.

I think the demurrer must be overruled. The liability of the defendants was not conditional, but absolute according to the express terms of their covenant. Plaintiffs were not bound to demand payment of the obligor, or to use due diligence as in the case of mercantile securities; hence they were not obliged to give notice of non-payment. Nor is a special request necessary in this case, as in those cases where defendant’s liability is contingent or dependent upon the happening of some event, or upon the doing of something by the plaintiff.

Demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Executors of Sibley v. Stull, 15 N.J.L. 332 (N.J. 1836).

15 N.J.L. 332 (Executors of Sibley v. Stull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.