Executors of Mahany v. Fuller

New York Supreme Court

Executors of Mahany v. Fuller

2 Johns. Cas. 209

DecidedJanuary 15, 1801

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 209 (Executors of Mahany v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Executors of Mahany v. Fuller, 2 Johns. Cas. 209 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1801).

Pincite

Opinion

*Lansing, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The statute, (10 sess. c. 72,) which was expressly enacted to restrain parties from bringing suits in this court, for the recovery of less than the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars, limits the plaintiff’s right to costs to the recovery of fifty dollars. In case he recovers more than fifty dollars, but less than two hundred and. fifty dollars, he is then entitled to such costs only as are taxed in the courts of common pleas ; and if less than fifty dollars is recovered, the defendant becomes entitled to costs against the plaintiff, as in the case of a verdict in his favor.

The plaintiffs in the present case prosecute as executors, and cannot be affected by the provision of the act which subjects plaintiffs, who recover less than fifty dollars to the payment of costs; for if such were to be the construction of the act, it would involve the inconsistency of subjecting executors, who were plaintiffs, to the payment of costs, if they sustained their suit, and recovered less than fifty dollars, and wholly exempting them from costs, in case of a total failure in their suit.

The preamble to the statute shows the intent of the legislature. It recites, that there are courts of record in the several counties, in which suitors may obtain justice, at a less expense, than in this court, and for that reason, imposes the restraints on suits, for small sums, in the supreme court.

This court has decided that executors, plaintiffs, who recover less than twenty-five dollars, in the courts of common pleas, are, nevertheless, entitled to costs. That decision was founded on the consideration, that the ten found act did not extend to cases of executors, and that consequently, the statutes, relative to costs, which gave costs to plaintiffs who recovered damages, applied.

The plea of set-off does not vary the case, for the statute puts it expressly on the recovery. As the plaintiffs would not [210]*210have been liable to pay costs, in case a verdict had been found for the defendant, neither ought *they to recover costs. The act ought not to be construed so as to deprive executors of the benefit of their general exemption from costs. The motion must be denied.

Motion denied.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*Lansing, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The statute, (10 sess. c. 72,) which was expressly enacted to restrain parties from bringing suits in this court, for the recovery of less than the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars, limits the plaintiff’s right to costs to the recovery of fifty dollars. In case he recovers more than fifty dollars, but less than two hundred and. fifty dollars, he is then entitled to such costs only as are taxed in the courts of common pleas ; and if less than fifty dollars is recovered, the defendant becomes entitled to costs against the plaintiff, as in the case of a verdict in his favor.

The plaintiffs in the present case prosecute as executors, and cannot be affected by the provision of the act which subjects plaintiffs, who recover less than fifty dollars to the payment of costs; for if such were to be the construction of the act, it would involve the inconsistency of subjecting executors, who were plaintiffs, to the payment of costs, if they sustained their suit, and recovered less than fifty dollars, and wholly exempting them from costs, in case of a total failure in their suit.

The preamble to the statute shows the intent of the legislature. It recites, that there are courts of record in the several counties, in which suitors may obtain justice, at a less expense, than in this court, and for that reason, imposes the restraints on suits, for small sums, in the supreme court.

This court has decided that executors, plaintiffs, who recover less than twenty-five dollars, in the courts of common pleas, are, nevertheless, entitled to costs. That decision was founded on the consideration, that the ten found act did not extend to cases of executors, and that consequently, the statutes, relative to costs, which gave costs to plaintiffs who recovered damages, applied.

The plea of set-off does not vary the case, for the statute puts it expressly on the recovery. As the plaintiffs would not [210]*210have been liable to pay costs, in case a verdict had been found for the defendant, neither ought *they to recover costs. The act ought not to be construed so as to deprive executors of the benefit of their general exemption from costs. The motion must be denied.

Motion denied.(

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Johns. Cas. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executors-of-mahany-v-fuller-nysupct-1801.