Executors of MacKenzie v. Brisbane

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 1, 1774
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622 (Executors of MacKenzie v. Brisbane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Executors of MacKenzie v. Brisbane, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1774).

Opinion

On Motion of Mr. Phepoe and with the Consent of Mr. Charles Cotes-worth Pinckney It is Ordered that Mr. Phepoe be admitted Solicitor for the Defendants in this Cause in the Stead of said Mr. Pinckney.

Wm Burrows Mag. in Can.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executors-of-mackenzie-v-brisbane-ctchansc-1774.